Use Case Foundry
Home

Trust

Keep private evidence controlled and decisions human-reviewed

The workflow is designed so teams can use sensitive context while retaining control over what evidence changes recommendations.

What this establishes

The decision in view.

Principle 1

Automatic mapping suggests facts; a person approves what enters the company map.

Principle 2

Teams can work with redacted or aggregate evidence where needed.

Principle 3

Workstation capture requires each employee’s approval, and raw activity never leaves their computer.

Principle 4

Public signals keep dated source links, expire when old, and can make only a small, visible change to supported ideas.

Principle 5

Stakeholders can inspect and question every recommendation.

Ways to use private evidence

Start with public pages, internal notes, summary data, or redacted samples. Add more sensitive evidence only when the assessment needs it.

Public evidence stays traceable

Every public signal keeps its source link and observation date, and expires when it becomes old. Suggested sources and priorities wait for review before they affect saved work. Reviewed public signals can slightly change the order of ideas already supported by internal evidence, but they cannot invent projects. When a pre-assessment is too thin, optional pressure enrichment runs in an isolated temporary scope and stores only cited context on that pre-assessment.

Employee-approved workflow summaries

Optional workstation capture suggests recurring workflows from an employee's own app and window activity. It records no screenshots, keystrokes, or file contents. Raw events are summarized on the employee’s computer, excluded apps and folders are filtered first, and nothing enters the company map without human review.

People control the facts

A recommendation does not change because automatic extraction guessed a fact. Reviewers decide what enters the company map.

Use your approved AI service

Teams can connect an approved cloud or locally hosted AI service and keep decision work within company rules.

Decisions remain open to review

Sources, score reasons, and ordering remain visible so sponsors can question assumptions instead of trusting a black box.

Related reading

Go deeper with resources

Review sample outputs, comparisons, and methodology pages to evaluate fit before a pilot.

Resource Resources hub

Browse all guides, sample outputs, comparisons, and templates.

Next steps

Go deeper with resources

Browse all guides, sample outputs, comparisons, and templates.