Trust

Trust boundary: private evidence with human-reviewed decisions

The workflow is designed so teams can use sensitive context while retaining control over what evidence changes recommendations.

1

Auto-map proposes facts; human review approves what enters the model.

2

Teams can work with redacted or aggregate evidence where needed.

3

Workstation capture is opt-in and local-first — raw activity never leaves the employee's machine.

4

Public signals retain dated source links, expire when stale, and influence grounded opportunities only within visible bounds.

5

Recommendations remain inspectable for governance and stakeholder challenge.

Private evidence options

Use public pages, internal notes, metadata, aggregates, or redacted samples to start and deepen assessments.

Public-evidence demand chain

Every outside-in signal keeps its exact source URL and observation date, and expires when it becomes stale. Proposed sources, signals, and likely priorities pass through review gates before they count in a real workspace. Accepted public-demand hypotheses can influence the ranking of opportunities already supported by internal evidence only within a visible cap; they cannot silently invent projects. The public URL teaser runs in an isolated throwaway user scope that is deleted after the brief is built.

Workstation capture, opt-in and local-first

Workstation capture drafts workflow facts from an employee's own app/window activity. Raw events are summarized on the employee's machine; only a redacted aggregate summary (or, once reviewed, a patch proposal) ever reaches Foundry. Denylists for apps, domains, and folders are applied before any event is tokenized, and nothing merges into a company model without a human accepting it.

Human review controls

No recommendation should change just because extraction guessed a fact. Reviewers decide what is accepted into the model.

Controlled deployment boundary

Teams can run analysis against approved LLM endpoints and keep decision workflows aligned with internal governance.

Auditability for stakeholders

Scoring rationale and sequencing logic remain visible so sponsor conversations focus on assumptions and evidence, not black-box outputs.

Related resources

Continue exploring methodology, samples, and practical assessment assets.

Ready to apply this to your own AI roadmap?

Use a sample workspace now, or contact us to discuss your assessment workflow.