For PE & VC portfolio ops and diligence

Underwrite AI claims with evidence, not slogans — across the whole portfolio.

Use Case Foundry helps diligence and portfolio-operations teams test whether a company can actually win with AI based on assets, data, workflows, constraints, and execution readiness — one repeatable assessment per portfolio company, with written score reasons that drop straight into IC memos and value-creation plans.

Assessment output
Evidence-backed opportunity shortlist
Quick wins, strategic bets, prerequisites
Highest-value evidence gaps to close
Generic ideas demoted before they consume roadmap attention

Why AI claims are hard to underwrite

The common failure mode is not a lack of AI ideas. It is a lack of company-specific evidence for choosing which ideas deserve attention.

  • Pitch decks say AI-enabled, but the evidence behind defensibility is thin.
  • Automation potential gets confused with durable moat or customer advantage.
  • Data access, proprietary workflow knowledge, and execution constraints are hard to compare quickly.
  • Every portfolio company needs an AI value-creation read, and ad hoc assessments don't compare across the portfolio.
  • A polished agent demo says nothing about whether it could clear a real eval, pilot, or production gate.

What diligence and portfolio ops can test

Use Case Foundry keeps the conversation grounded in workflows, data, pains, constraints, feasibility, moat, and evidence quality.

1

A zero-cooperation public-evidence read of customer pressure and likely internal priorities before management access.

2

A moat-grounded assessment of which AI bets the company is positioned to win.

3

A clear split between feasible automation, strategic advantage, prerequisites, and gaps.

4

Questions for management that expose missing evidence before investment or acquisition decisions.

5

The same repeatable assessment across every portfolio company, so AI value-creation reads are comparable.

6

A deterministic readiness verdict — ready, needs evidence, or unsafe — for any agent claim under review.

A diligence memo for AI readiness

Use Case Foundry turns company evidence into a structured view of impact, feasibility, moat, quality, and readiness so diligence and portfolio-operations teams can challenge AI narratives with specifics — including whether an agent claim would clear an eval suite and a production handoff gate.

Quick win

Pilot the grounded workflow

Start where pain, data access, and human review make the first experiment credible.

Strategic bet

Invest where the company has advantage

Prioritize candidates backed by proprietary data, scarce expertise, or reusable abstractions.

Evidence gap

Close what changes the decision

Turn missing facts into interviews, metadata checks, redacted samples, or instrumentation work.

Why the recommendations are easier to defend

The method makes the reasoning inspectable before budget, pilots, or diligence decisions depend on it.

1

Every inferred demand mandate retains its dated public source chain and remains a hypothesis until reviewed.

2

Moat scoring rewards proprietary data, scarce expertise, reusable abstractions, and switching costs.

3

Generic ideas are demoted before they become polished but weak investment claims.

4

Evidence gaps become diligence questions for management, customers, and technical owners.

5

Written score reasons make every ranking inspectable in an IC memo or value-creation plan.

6

Readiness verdicts come from the graph and scaffold, not from the target company's own LLM narrative.

Built for sensitive evidence work

Use public pages, notes, metadata, aggregates, redacted samples, or controlled LLM endpoints. Human reviewers decide which facts enter the model.

Trust boundary

Private discovery without forcing raw records into the workflow

Auto-map and evidence extraction propose changes, but scoring only changes after a reviewer accepts the facts.

Build an AI roadmap you can defend

Use a sample company now, or reach out to discuss the assessment workflow for your team.